previous | main index page | next

February 6, 2008

How Much Is That Referee On The Blue Line?

Compared to the Providence Bruins game on Sunday vs. the Worcester Sharks, the Super Bowl seemed awfully anticlimactic. Maybe it was because the P-Bruins won and the Pats lost. Maybe it was because unlike the hockey officials, the football officials knew how to call a game! Either way I know that I was content to watch the big game in the comfort of my own home, under the covers with the laptop catching up work and getting my taxes done. Lame...maybe. But when you are always running in different directions, a little down time isn't so bad! The Providence game was however one I was glad I did not miss.

Sporting my newly made "I'm Lovin' It" t-shirt (the fruits of giving us a Friday night off from hockey), I made my way to my seat with Cheri, Jen and my "little friend" Rebecca (Big Friend/Little Friend is a volunteer program similar to Big Brother/Big Sister) who is herself going to need a shirt in honor of her favorite player Nate Thompson. We watched warm ups and got settled in for the game.

The first two periods of the game were pretty average. It was during the third period that the fireworks began. When the period started, the Bruins were trailing 2 - 1 with their lone goal being scored by Jeff Hoggan. Five minutes into the third period Wacey Rabbit scored his first goal of the night and thus began the ridiculous spiral of events. Forty three seconds later, Riley Armstrong of the Sharks scored an unassisted goal making the score 3 - 2 Worcester. At least that is what the ref claimed. This was one of those moments that seemed to go in slow motion. It appears a shot has been deflected. Bodies are turned and people are skating the other direction and then suddenly, just behind the goaltender’s foot appears a loose puck sliding towards the next. He spins around and throws his glove over it to stop it. The light signifying a goal does not go on. It appears that per the expertise of the goal judge who was sitting just behind the net that no goal was scored, yet somewhere from the blue line, the ref signals goal. WHAT?!? Now forgive me if I am wrong (I will always admit that I am somewhat of a newbie to the sport of hockey in comparison to the many other fans I have gotten to know over the last few years) but I thought the role of the goal judge was to sit behind the net and determine whether the puck has crossed the line, thusly scoring a goal. While the referee has the final say, I would imagine that they would look to a goal judge for assistance in a situation where a fluke event such as this takes place and he himself is not right there on top of the puck watching it happen. I did however decide that before I started blowing smoke I better read up so I went to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goal_judge According to this site, the role of the goal judge is to:

"determine(s) whether a player has scored a goal by watching to see if the puck has crossed the goal line completely. One goal judge is positioned outside the rink directly behind each goal net. For arenas so equipped, the goal judge turns on a red light behind the goal to alert everyone that a goal has just been scored. The goal judge acts only in an advisory role; the referee has the sole authority to award goals and can override the opinion of the goal judge."

As for the role of the referee:
"A referee is responsible for the general supervision of the game. He can be identified by his red or orange armbands. His judgment of goals is final."

Fair enough. I get that the referee has the power to award goals, but as a logically thinking individual, I would like to think that if the referee is not right there to see the action that he would look to an off ice official who had a perfect vantage point for assistance. There is nothing wrong with looking for input before making a final decision. Especially when that goal judge is sitting right there, sees the play and does not signal the goal. Unfortunately for the Providence Bruins, on this day, the referee decided he was playing for the Sharks and decided to give Worcester the goal. Suffice to say, he was booed...booed very loudly. His next few calls got him booed even more. There were a few of us about to take up a collection to buy him back and I might have heard a few threats of pulling a Tanya Harding on him, but thankfully it never came to that. Our ever dependable Providence Bruins stepped up to remind everyone why they are in first place! You see Mr. Referee, Worcester could not win even when you cheated for them. Even when you stuffed Nate Thompson in the box (just after awarding bogus goals to Worcester), handing him a four minute minor and then tossing him out of the game (which by the way excellent job Nate...you got the place even more fired up..just as a captain should! You only emphasized what all the fans in the stands were feeling, thinking and wanted to demonstrate ourselves) you still couldn’t fix the game. You know why? Because Providence is too good for you and your well paying Sharks!

Just after killing off the 4 minute minor, Providence came back and struck where it counted. On the scoreboard! As Imbeault (who was serving the Thompson penalty) came out of the box, the puck was passed to him by Matt Hunwick and boom, right into the net. It was Imbeault's third goal of the season and could not have come at a more perfect time! Thirty one seconds later, it was Sean Curry taking control of the puck and passing it off to Hendricks who scored his 14th goal of the season. Trevelyan and Hoggan got in on the action too. TJ got the puck up to Hoggan who shot it towards the net and Wacey Rabbit was there to tip the puck in scoring his second goal of the night. With less than a minute left in the game Jonathan Sigalet helped put the final nail in the coffin as he passed the puck to Rabbit who scored an open net goal making the final score of the game 6 - 3 Bruins and earning Wacey a hat trick!

Big congratulations to Wacey for his huge accomplishment and of course a big congratulations to the team who got fired up and fought back and walked away with the win. This season I have been a pretty calm fan. I have not screamed and yelled as much in years past. Thanks to one heck of an officiating job, I had no energy left to scream at the Pats on my television during the Super Bowl. Furthermore Bill Belichick...what the HELL were you doing wearing a RED sweatshirt?????? If you have an 18-0 season, how do you go into the last game and CHANGE your sweatshirt. Superstitions Bill......superstitions! It is the same as wearing the same underwear all during the playoffs (but remember people, as long as you are wearing the same pair, it IS ok to wash it every night!!!)

Letters of love, lust, or disagreement can be sent to rlord (at) soveryobsessed.com

by Rebecca | 3:01 PM | 2
filed under: 07-08 season || providence bruins

Comments

Chip said:

Ms. Lord,

Let me start out by saying how important it is to serve the youth. The Big Brother/Sister organization is wonderful. Kudos to you.

I was directed to your rant by bostonbruinslinks. Being a ref, naturally I wanted to see if this was going to be praise or disgust, it's usually disgust.
I was not at the game so I have to take your view into account.
You claim the ref called the goal from the blueline. Are you sure it was the ref and not the linesman? Your description of the play has "everyone" skating in the other direction, which if the ref was a good ref, includes him. The official on the blueline would then be a linesman, he would not leave the line until the puck had crossed over to neutral ice. If the ref had not been looking in the direction of play, the linesman has the authority to call a goal, it rarely happens, but he does have that authority. He then would tell the ref exactly what he saw and the ref would have final say. If the linesman was adamant about the puck crossing the line, the ref would have no other choice then to award the goal, unless of course instant replay were to be utilized.
You claim the crowd wasn't too pleased with the decision but you fail to mention the Providence bench. If there was no reaction then it should be determined the call was right, not to mention if the goalie went a little nuts, again you didn't specify.
Too bad there isn't any video.
As for Thompson, Abuse of Officials was the call that got him tossed. I looked up the game report. Being a ref, this is no longer tolerated by coaches or players. There has been a lot of emphasis placed on this at our seminars. Truely it would only take a few choice words to get a player or coach tossed.


February 7, 2008 12:21 PM
Rebecca said:

Oh Chip,

First off, while most “rants” regarding referees are in disgust, I do not dislike refs! In fact more often than not I give refs (and linesmen) a lot of credit for the work they do. I know I certainly could not do the job (even though I think I do a hell of a good job from the stands! Lol!)

When I wrote my post I was going more for emphasis on the frustration…and while the play FELT like slow motion it most certainly was not in slow motion. When you are watching the puck slide (I sit right next to the net) towards the net, as a fan you don’t keep a head count of EVERYONE on the ice and their location (another reason I give refs credit…being able to see off sides, too many men on the ice etc). All I know is there was no goal signaled, it looked like the goalie had made the save and then the next thing there is a conference going on, hands waving and goals being awarded…It is just my PERSONAL opinion that in situation where the linesman or the ref is not right on top of that net and not right up on top of that line to be sure that puck crossed over then they should refer to the goal judge who is sitting right there and can SEE the line. It would be one thing if the goalie had reached behind him and grabbed the puck obviously snagging it after it crossed the line and trying to make it look like it did not go in, BUT when he throws his glove down on top of it and hold it there not moving to show he has got it?????

Not that it is any excuse, but I do not always put as much detail as I should in my posts because I barely ever have time to write and when I do it is usually on a lunch break at work! Between my regular job, working Boston Bruins games, working Celtics games, going to Providence games, the volunteer work that I do, the 120 mile round trip commute each day and trying to have some sort of a resemblance of a life, I am tired ;) I guess what I am saying is that I am not always as focused on the details of everything but more focused on the point I am trying to express. While I recognize that good detail is needed to validate points sometimes I am just not able to get it all out there in the first shot. I am also going to refer back to the admission that I am not as well versed in hockey as most as I am newer to the sport and learned things as I have gone...(this leads to the sequence I was going to do on the site last summer but never had a chance to do and will try to do this summer exploring the basics of hockey) for those readers who do not knwo all of the ins and out and thus making me even more educated as well.

The crowd was not pleased. Nor was the bench or the goaltender who was having a discussion with the ref and pointing to the goal judge with his stick. While I was not involved in the conversation as I am a stand dweller not a player or official on the ice, I think it was quite obvious he was trying to plead his case and the expression on his face (because yes I sit close enough to the ice to see it when he is facing my direction) was not one of pleasure or implying he felt the right call was made.

As for the Thompson situation...here is where I stand on that one...I do not promote the "abuse" of officials. Now knowing that I sit close enough to the goalie to see his face and that I sit next to the net I am now going to throw out there that the penalty box is to my left and over a few sections. If I look closely I can see inside of it though generally that is not where my attention falls. Thompson was sent to the box to serve a penalty. Once inside he smashed his stick. This was when he was ejected from the game. Call it what you will, but the sound that came from the box did not sound like him beating the penalty box official...more like him abusing his poor stick! When he came out of the box he absolutely mouthed off at the ref but never laid a finger on him. While these words could have easily gotten him kicked out, if he had already been ejected then what? How can you eject someone twice?

Listen...here is the tired me on her one night off for the week laying it out there. We won...at the end of the day that is all that matters! I do not think officials should be abused nor do I think they should be taunted and told they suck! However, I also think that there are times when sometimes it is important to consult with everyone. Maybe it is the woman in me, the politician in me, or the lack of sleep, but I think there are times when the entire picture needs to be examined. I am sure my description was a bit off...it was written some three odd days later on no sleep, cold medicine, and on a time limit as I had to get out the door to work the Celtics game. Just trying to make a point! But just remember Chip...it would be kinda weird to chant Ref we love you! So unless fans are screaming at you, you are not that bad off ;) I have no problem making the boys cookies for their road trip bus rides....instead of waving an olive branch...I will throw out there that should the refs and linesmen want cookies for their rides, they can have some too! My way of letting them know that on an average night we like them, appreciate them and respect them...until they tangle with crazy calls ;)


February 7, 2008 9:32 PM