previous | main index page | next

July 19, 2007

Oh, KPDP, you make me giggle. Ha-ha!

... but Fernandez is already penciled in as the likely stopper for the 7 p.m. start. If the season goes to his liking, the 32-year-old backstop will be penciled in for 60 or more games this season, which would also be to the liking of general manager Peter Chiarelli, who on July 1 shipped prospect Petr Kalus and a fourth-round draft pick to the Minnesota Wild to acquire Fernandez.

Sixty or more games?

What remains to be seen, of course, is how new coach Claude Julien distributes his goalies' ice time in the upcoming season. If Fernandez indeed holds office for three-quarters of the schedule, that certainly will be an abrupt change for incumbent No. 1 workhorse Tim Thomas, he of 104 games the last 1 1/2 seasons.

Mmmmm, I would like to see a trade. For Tim. We could never get Jason Spezza for him, but I hear the Sens still haven't locked Emery in yet. Maybe we could work out a deal that lets us steal some of their other boys. There isn't any quicker way into my hockey heart then for Boston to start adding Sens to the roster. It won't stop me from going to Ottawa in November, but it might keep me going to Boston all winter.

Though, if it means he'd get a chance to play and prove that he's NHL-caliber, I'd like to see us move Hannu to a team that would appreciate him.

Hannu Toivonen and Tuukka Rask also will be challenging for seats in the Boston dressing room, but right now they're both pegged for Providence.

Riddle me this: If Hannu has a one-way, one-year contract in Boston, outside of rehabilitation time in the A, how can he be 'pegged for Providence'? Because something about that statement seems contractually implausible to me... I wish I could put my finger on it... but I only took that one business law course, and we didn't discuss sport contracts, so I could just be a little bit not right.

And internets, please- all of you abandon this ri-diga-dong-diculous notion of Rask in Boston this season. I love love love hoping for the best -and really, playing in the NHL is one of the best jobs I can imagine, outside of that of "lottery winner" or "photographer" (you would totally laugh at me if I told you where my dream photographic job was) - but the kid will need time to adjust to the North American style of hockey, and he will need time to get used to the grind of pro games. Granted, I did not attend development camp last week (things like "work" and "non-hockey social events" got in my way), so I might just be completely and utterly wrong about Rask, but I would like to pretend I'm not. If they weren't willing to play Hannu much last year - and he has NHL experience - I really don't see Rask getting a fulltime job.

[source for all the above quotes is this article here]

In other news, Danny LaCouture signed with Anaheim today. I'm bummed because he had been seen around the Dunk when Providence was in the playoffs, at the same time the brass was in town, earmarking who they were going to steal for this upcoming season. Word had it that he was interested in signing with us. I'd kind of hoped it was true.

The AHL announced that the Binghamton Sens will be hosting the 2008 All-Star festivities on Jan 27-28. However, it did NOT release the schedule yet, something it is APPARENTLY not willing to do until AUGUST, can you believe that? It's so far away!

by Heather | 9:36 PM | 4
filed under: offseason notes

Comments

Melissa said:

I would think that if Hannu is actually "pegged for Providence," the one way deal would probably be a part of the negotiations with Tuukka.

Like, maybe Hannu wouldn't have signed a two way deal, and Tuukka wouldn't sign unless Hannu did.

I think, considering they both have the same agent (and share one with Timmy none-the-less), the agent was taking advantage of the fact that he represented three of and could use that to maximize the deals for all involved.

Now the above is just my attempted explaination if all four of the candidates who can actually compete for a position in Boston this year are retained.

However, I also thought I read that Chiarelli said they would most likely be shipping someone off.

SO WHO KNOWS. Personally, I'd actually rather see Hannu start in the A and FORCE Boston to bring him up with an outstanding performance. From what I saw of him in Providence at the end of last season, he was good...but not fabulous. I think he has the makings of a fabulous NHL goalie, and I'd rather him see a stream of constant playing time in Providence than have him rot on the bench in Boston.


July 20, 2007 11:06 AM
Sophia said:

When I remarked on the number of goaltenders in the Bruins/Providence stables to Jordan Sigalet at his ShutOut MS charity game, his feeling was that if anyone was traded away it would probably be Tim, (which would suck by the way, we LOVE Timmy!). He thought that Manny and Hannu would play the big house and he and Tuukka would handle Providence. It will be interesting to see who ends up at goalie camp in Calgary.

The fickleness of the game gets me. When Tim was hot and the Bruins were playing at playoff level, he could do no wrong, but when everyone's game fell apart and Tim's timing was off, they want him gone. Sometimes the whole picture is important, if all the pieces aren't falling together, it isn't just the fault of one. (sorry for the soapbox.)


July 20, 2007 1:17 PM
Heather said:

Melissa: See, here's my thing about Hannu in the A: been there, done that. He was down in PVD for two full years, one of which was the lockout year. Tim was his cohort his rookie year - Tim had a majority of the starts - and Hannu had a rotating system of back-ups when he was the full-time starter in PVD during the lockout. He backstopped the team all the way to a game six in the third round, only to be bested by Nittymakki and the eventual Calder champions. The team would have gone further, but they were all struck down with the flu. That season's performance rightfully earned him a place in Boston out of camp in 05-06, but when we resigned Andy Raycroft, Hannu was used sparingly, even though A-Ray sucked out loud. Then Hannu got hurt and was out all the rest of the season.

He again made the team out of camp last season, and again, I believe rightfully so. Again, though, he was used sparingly, and that bothered me. Hannu has seen all he can see down at the AHL level. Now, I love the AHL, truly I do, but the talent down here, it's not as polished (yet) as it is in the NHL. He needs more minutes facing players who are, quite honestly, better. He's not going to see much of that in the AHL, unfortunately. He's reached the bottom of the barrel with the AHL. It's time for him to get a new barrel. Whether that's simply more ice time in Boston, or it's a whole other team completely, the kid needs more of a consistent challenge then what the AHL can present him with. Having him see the bulk of the starts in Providence will only hamper the development of the other prospects, such as Rask and Sigalet. At the end of last season when Hannu was assigned to Providence for the duration, it didn't help Jordan to just keep taking notes on who won faceoffs or to keep tossing other players towels. I'm not saying Hannu should see sixty starts next season, but I am saying that the kid is a better goaltender then Andy Ray ever was, and that waste started more games then not in both 03-04 and 05-06. Hannu needs some consistent time to prove himself. Not a game once every month or two, when Tim needs to sit and breathe a minute.

They will be shipping someone off. They have a logjam in net: Fernandez, Thomas, Toivonen, Sigalet, Rask, Brown. Mike Brown will probably see the ECHL again, but that still leaves three solids - Fernandez, Tim, Hannu (the one-way contract indicates that it is for the NHL only. for him to play in Providence outside of a rehab stint, he would need to sign a separate contract with Providence. This would be a violation of his contract terms with Boston)- bidding for a place in Boston. Rask will see Providence because he needs to adjust his game, and that will only come with time and minutes. Jordan will get to take notes on faceoffs again, because his handwriting is just so gosh darn pretty. If I could pick, I'd ship off Thomas- it would clear off cap space, and we wouldn't be overpaying for an adequate backup. If Fernandez is going to see sixty-plus starts, whomever he is tandemed with is going to see loads of bench time. From a business standpoint, it makes more sense to pay Hannu less (half-a-million) to do it then to pay Tim (one million plus) more to do it.

Sophie: We encourage soapboxes here. To be very honest, even when he was doing superb, I was not a Tim fan. I love love loved him when he was with Providence, but I was not as impressed with him in Boston. He -for lack of a better term- flops a lot. He does the same things that people used to fault Steve Shields for. I did not think that Tim was a good #1 goalie for Boston to rely on. And last season, the team chemistry in Boston was a mess. I am sure that did not help matters (Tim can only stop the pucks; he can't score them, too.)(Well, generally speaking.), and I could go on all day long hypothesizing where the issues within the team lay, but it'd be purely speculative.

Boston's fickle. That sentence is not designed to be an excuse, but it's fact. I don't like when goalies get blamed for losses (unless they're letting in softies, like when Chris Phillips and Ray Emery scored on themselves in the CUP FINALS, WHO DOES THAT?!?), because those are usually team efforts, much in the same way that wins are team efforts. I believe shutouts to be team efforts. I am a fan of fantastic goaltending, and I don't feel that Tim's best is good enough to get 'er done every night. And sadly, it was apparent last season when Boston didn't make the playoffs for the second consecutive year.

I do not know what this season will bring for the goalies I dig, and I am apprehensive about Fernandez. We gave up a lot for him in Petr Kalus, and his numbers don't really indicate to me that he's worth it. I really want to see Hannu show up to camp and play the way I know he can, the way I have seen him play. I want for him to show up and make Chiarelli's decision on who to ship out very easy: anyone but Hannu. I want a lot of things, though. We'll see what I actually get.


July 20, 2007 9:13 PM
SophiA said:

So, where are we at now that our ever-beloved Peter Chiarelli has traded Hannu to the St. Louis Blues, (who, god knows, can use him!)?!

Is it just me, or is Peter Chiarelli the biggest mistake that the Bruins have made?! He has no sense of loyalty to the players and certain no idea how hard it is to make magic between players if they are there one day and gone tomorrow. I'm voting for trading Chiarelli!!


July 23, 2007 6:01 PM